WHO Treaty & Profiteering
Is the Treaty more likely to generate more pandemics than to prevent them?
Home | All Posts | Notes | Clips
1. Transfer of Wealth
In reference to the business opportunity associated with the WHO's proposed instruments, David Bell states in his article ‘Pandemics: A Business Opportunity’:
It amounts to perhaps the most infallible wealth concentration scheme in history. The general model proved itself during Covid-19... (Bold mine)
The global pandemic cartel amassed huge fortunes during the Covid era, whilst many countries, like NZ, have amassed huge debts and thus have grown poorer. Never before has the world seen such an enormous transfer of wealth.
The WHO have shifted away from their focus on sanitation, nutrition and endemic infections that kill people. With the guidance and support of the World Economic Forum, they are now focused much, much more on potential goldmines like Disease X, i.e., the name given to the next unknown pandemic.
There are huge monetary incentives for a corrupt WHO to declare potential threats and then scare everyone into accepting a “safe and effective” vaccine that has not been tested properly and will likely prove to be as ineffective and harmful as the mRNA Covid vaccines. From around the world, so much research and many highly skilled people support these claims. Read this brilliant but disturbing article: ‘As Cancers in the Young Rise, the Pandemic Response Must Be Probed’.
From the article:
Studies show that repeated vaccinations potentially undermine mechanisms of immunity—disabling antibodies that fight cancer and even Covid—and perhaps facilitate cancer growth. Rather than cause cancer, the vaccines may “generate a pro-tumorigenic milieu,” researchers posit.
Times are changing. The Overton Window is opening. Overseas, articles on vaccine harm are beginning to be printed in mainstream media. See here.
I believe WHO does not want to know the truth. Their telling the truth would jeopardize a good portion of their funding.
2. Sharing High-Risk Viruses
The WHO promotes the sharing of potentially high-risk viruses.
From Article 12 of the Pandemic Treaty draft dated 22 April 2024. You can view it here and here.
1. A multilateral access and benefit sharing system for pathogens with pandemic potential, the “WHO Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing System” (PABS System), is hereby established to ensure rapid, systematic and timely sharing of PABS Material and Information…. The PABS System shall be coordinated and convened by WHO…
From Definitions:
“PABS Material and Information” means the biological material from a pathogen with pandemic potential, as well as sequence information relevant to the development of pandemic-related health products.
How will sharing such viruses and their sequence information help prevent the next pandemic? It will more likely have the opposite effect.
Also, if Parties provide the WHO with the biological materials of pathogens with pandemic potential, they will get an equitable and fair share in any monetary benefits. This is certainly NOT an incentive to prevent pandemics; it’s a perverse incentive.
3. Covid 19 and Gain-of-Function Research
Beyond reasonable doubt, the recent Covid-19 pandemic originated from gain-of-function research. See evidence here. The WHO treaty does nothing to discourage this kind of research. In fact, it encourages it.
How in the world is creating high-risk viruses going to prevent the next pandemic? As with sharing, it will more likely than not create the next one. Leaks occur unintentionally and intentionally!
At the EU Parliament International Covid Summit last year, Dr Martin gives a chilling 20 minute talk on the creation of the Sars Coronavirus. View here.
And here is a one minute clip compilation from the video.
If the WHO really wanted to prevent pandemics, surely they would be speaking out against manipulating pathogens? And they would not have tried so hard to hide the truth about the origins of the Sars Coronavirus.
4. Create a Problem: Produce the Solution
What a lucrative business model for the unscrupulous!
Dr Meryl Nass M.D. stated in her recent article: Pandemic Pathogens Everywhere:
If you share these organisms widely, you will not only have accidents, but you won't be able to tell whether any were deliberately released nor who did it—because they will have been "shared globally."
Dr Nass also pointed out, it is the public who pays for the cost of the research, and then pays again for accidents and deliberate leaks.
Listen to Meryl Nass's speech here: The Pacific Rim Coalition Webinar. Her speech begins at around the 30 minute mark. Here is a slide from her presentation:
CRISPR and other emerging gene-editing tools make it relatively easy to edit genetic material including viruses.
5. Who is Pulling WHO's Strings?
David Bell pointed out in Pandemics: A Business Opportunity:
The WHO is an organization that receives roughly a quarter of its funding from the pharmaceutical industry and major pharmaceutical investors. These same sponsors have profited greatly from the Covid-19 response and are strongly aligned with the WHO’s current pandemic preparation and response proposals. The largest country-based funders are the USA and Germany, also heavily invested in Pharma. German public money backed BioNtech, the developer of the Pfizer mRNA Covid vaccine.
To learn more about Germany and the WHO listen to or read these recent Brownstone Articles: “Dreams of 'Vaccine Hub Germany” and 'Gates or Germany? Who “Owns” the WHO’s Covid-19 Response? ' And to learn about the BioNTech/Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation connection, read this article by true crime writer, John Leake.
Insights from the article, ‘Gates or Germany? Who “Owns” the WHO’s Covid-19 Response?’
In 2020, virtually overnight Germany became the top funder of the WHO's Covid 19 response. It contributed 30% of the total, and in 2021, the year of mass vaccination, it contributed almost 40%.
Why would Germany do that? In 2021, BioNTech made over 15 billion in profit.
Germany’s massively preponderant role in funding the WHO’s Covid-19 response might also help to explain some major, and often otherwise puzzling, decisions of the organization: like, for instance, the decision, in January 2020, to quickly adopt the notoriously oversensitive PCR protocol devised by German virologist Christian Drosten as the gold standard for detecting Covid-19 infection – thus, in effect, ensuring that the illness would obtain pandemic status.
My previous article linked to information on the scandalous use of PCR tests. See here.
6. The Treaty & Vaccines
Within the Treaty, a main focus for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response is on vaccines.
Why vaccines? Why not on clean water, sanitation, healthy food, and healthy lifestyles etc., measures that actually improve health, strengthen immune function and so on?
Vaccines are a goldmine—imagine the profit generated by the sheer numbers of 'vaccines' required to get multiple needles in every arm all over the world, young and old alike. It won’t matter if they're not needed. It won’t matter if they don't work, don't stop infection and don't stop transmission. And it won’t matter if they cause injuries and deaths. I believe, those with the power, those that pull the WHO's strings, will control the narrative and distort the truth.
After all, the WHO are still promoting the Covid 19 jabs despite the growing avalanche of evidence against the shots. See here. Fortunately, the truth is also beginning to trickle out through official medical journals, as Dr Campbell notes in his video 'Trickle of Truth'.
For these reasons alone, we need to reject the WHO. In my opinion, they are not SERVING the PEOPLE; they are serving those who pull their strings—those who want to hide or censor the truth so they can profit enormously from vaccines etc.
7. CEPI, Pandemics & Profit
CEPI stands for the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations'. A large part of their mission is to accelerate the development of vaccines.
From Pandemics: A Business Opportunity:
'CEPI, a key player running the rushed vaccine effort, is a public-private partnership set up at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in 2017 by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (a major pharmaceutical investor), The Wellcome Trust, and a number of countries. CEPI was specifically set up to make vaccines and similar products for pandemics at a time when the world had gone 100 years without one – the last major pandemic having been the pre-antibiotic era Spanish flu.'
In 2017, did the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and co know something we didn't know?
The article goes on to say:
Money, in large amounts, is really good for helping people to understand that wrong might be better than right. It also helps those who don’t care at all about right, or truth, to rise to the top despite their obvious unfitness. It allows the media to survive if they please these sponsors, and it can help country delegates to find more important priorities than the good of their own people...
Since 2017, six major vaccine makers have joined the coalition as “partners” as well as the World Health Organization and Doctors Without Borders. See here.
Are the WHO and co setting the stage for more pandemics? They have warned us there will be more frequent or more deadly pandemics caused by zoonosis. Read my previous article, ‘The WHO Treaty and Pandemic Threats’, to learn how the data was manipulated to support these claims. Therefore, when more pandemics/outbreaks occur, we won't be surprised, will we?
8. Treaty Madness
In this 1 minute clip, you cannot help but laugh as James Roguski points out the sheer madness of the WHO and what they want to do.
And in this following clip, James exposes more of WHO’s stupidity or corruption? After all, why waste money on 1.4 million tests during a cholera outbreak when people need clean water and sanitation?
You can watch the full interview associated with these clips here.
Conclusion
The pharmaceutical industry, their investors and the like stand to gain huge profits and influence with each outbreak so how much effort will be made to prevent outbreaks/pandemics for profit from happening?
After all, the WHO Treaty actually supplies the incentive. As mentioned earlier, if Parties provide the WHO with the biological materials of pathogens with pandemic potential, they will get an equitable and fair share in any monetary benefits.
The rewards are just too great for the unscrupulous. For instance, although the mRNA vaccines are harming people, the WHO, the WEF, and captured medical authorities around the world are continuing to push their use for a disease that is not a threat to most. This to me seems uncaring, unethical, callous and cruel.
If people can give these 'vaccines' to babies (who are NOT at risk from Covid 19) and risk damaging their little hearts and more, they are capable of doing anything.
Therefore, in my opinion the pandemic agreement will generate many more pandemics. It won’t stop any. It’s focused on the wrong things.
The WHO & Bird Flu: Will a Manipulated Bird Flu be the next pandemic? That is the subject of the next article.